Bombay High CourtWP/923/2018dismissedrule discharged

Ruchit Dilip Korat v. Vijay Alias Balasaheb Pundalikrao Band

2020-03-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote1 pages

0303wp923.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.923/2018 Ruchit Dilip Korat ...Versus...

Vijay alias Balasaheb Pundalikrao Band - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------- - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders or directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------- - - Shri K.P. Mahalle, Counsel for petitioner Shri N.R. Saboo, Counsel for respondent CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 03/03/2020 This petition challenges the order of the District Judge - 4, Amravati dated 08/12/2017 in Misc. Civil Application No.71/2017, which is passed on an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone the delay of 240 days caused in preferring an appeal against the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.247/2012.

It is a settled position of law that the impugned order is susceptible to challenge by way of second appeal. In that light of the matter, the present writ petition is not tenable and the same is dismissed. It shall be open for the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate proceedings, as permissible in law. No order as to costs.

JUDGE Wadkar, P.S.