Smt. Ranjana Mukunda Gedam v. Sonu @ Surendra Tambipillay

1 cac77.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAC) NO.77 OF 2018 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.112 OF 2018 (Smt. Ranjana Mukunda Gedam ..vs.. Sonu @ Surendra Tambi Pillay) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.A. Meshram, Counsel for the applicant. CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 14-12-2018 The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the address mentioned in the cause title is the same address which is furnished by the non-applicantdefendant in the civil suit. The learned Counsel further states that the report of the Bailiff is that the nonapplicant does reside at the said address but visits the same intermittently.

2.

The statement is accepted.

3.

The application for substituted service is allowed. 4.

The notice be published in all the three editions of the daily newspaper Lokmat.

JUDGE adgokar