Bombay High CourtCP/1/2018disposedoff

Vijay S/O Tulsiram Jadhao v. Sudhirchand Shekhar Panchabhai, Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C., Nagpur

2018-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cp01.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 01/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6285/2016 Vijay S/o Tulshiram Jadhav ..VS..

Sudhirchand Shekhar Panchabhai - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri C.V. Jagdale, Advocate for the petitioner Shri V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.

DATED : 19 /06/2018 1] Heard.

2] The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent submit that directions of which breach is complained have been complied with. The learned advocate for the petitioner states that in view of the compliance, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the contempt petition further. There are no allegations of any malafide. We also see no reason to continue with the prosecution of the contempt petition.

3] The contempt petition is disposed. Notice issued to the respondents is discharged. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Ansari