Ganesh S/O Prabhakar Rewatkar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Narkhed Dist Nagpurur

2025:BHC-NAG:14880-DB 1 7-APPA-956-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.956 OF 2025 Ganesh S/o Prabhakar Rewatkar, Tah. Narkhed, Dist. Nagpur vs.

State of Maharashtra, Thr. PSO, PS Narkhed and anr. - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - Shri A. G. Hunge, Advocate for applicant.

Shri K. R. Lule, Addl. Public Prosecutor for non-applicant No.1/State. Shri C. R. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 23rd December, 2025 Shri C. R. Thakur, learned counsel appears for respondent No.2.

2.

By present application, the applicant-informant is seeking to condone delay of 276 days in filing appeal against judgment and order dated 03/05/2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Case No.570/2019.

3.

The counsel for applicant submits that delay has occurred because the applicant was suffering from Dengue, his shop was burned and therefore he was in financial crisis as well. 4.

The counsel for respondent No.2 has no serious objection nor has learned Additional Public Prosecutor to allow the application. 5.

In view of above and for the reasons set out in the application, application is allowed as prayed for. 6.

Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered and process as per Rules.

(Raj D. Wakode, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) Asmita