Dr. Satyendu S/O Sukhlal Saha v. M/S B. D. S. Nirman Through Its Partner, Shri Pradumnya S/O B. Sahasrabhojne And Another

appa2146of17.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) 2146 OF 2017 (Dr. Satyendu s/o. Sukhlal Sahu...vs.. M/s. B.D.S. Nirman & anr.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri E.W. Nawab, counsel for applicant.

Shri N.B. Jawade, counsel for respondents.

CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE: 19 th APRIL, 2018.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) 2146 OF 2017 Heard.

Perused the contents of the application.

The learned counsel for respondents Shri N.B. Jawade seriously opposes the application.

However, since the application is supported by the affidavit of the learned counsel, the application is allowed.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) 2147 OF 2017 Heard.

The application seeking restoration is predicated on the contention of the learned counsel that inadvertently

appa2146of17.odt 2 the matter was not marked on the cause list. The application is supported by the affidavit of the learned counsel. Hence, although Shri N.B. Jawade, the learned counsel seriously opposes the restoration, Criminal Application 819 of 2015 is restored to file.

JUDGE rsb