← Library
Bombay High CourtCAS/75/2019ca disposed off

Nandkumar S/O Shridhar Tambekar v. Arvind S/O Purushottam Tambekar And 2 Others

2021-07-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak2 pages

sa.600.04 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAS] No.75 of 2019 with Civil Application [CAS] No.76 of 2019 in Second Appeal No.600 of 2004 Nandkumar Shridhar Tambekar vs.

Arvind Purushottam Tambekar & another =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Y.J. Chandurkar h/f Shri J.J. Chandurkar, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.

CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 28 th JULY, 2021.

Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned Counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

Respondent No.1 expired on 12/09/2016. The appellant got knowledge through the learned Counsel for respondent No.1. Thereafter, the present applications are filed. There was a delay of 727 days in preferring the application for bringing the legal heirs on record. The delay is satisfactorily explained. Hence the order :

O R D E R

The delay caused in moving the application is condoned.

The name of respondent No.1 be deleted and his legal representatives be brought on record by carrying out necessary amendments.

sa.600.04 2/2 Dismissal of appeal against respondent No.1 is set aside.

The applications are disposed of.

Second Appeal No.600/2004 :

Heard.

Issue notice to the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 for final disposal, returnable on 6th September, 2021.

Copy of private paper-book be supplied to them.

JUDGE *sandesh