Bombay High CourtWP/8414/2018disposedoff

Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sanstha, Therough Its Managing Trustee, Shegaon v. State Of Maharashtra, Department Of Urban Development And Planning, Through Its Principal Secretary

2019-11-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo2 pages

wp8414.18.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.8414 OF 2018 (Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan, Shegaon, Dist. Buldhana thr. its Managing Trustee Vs. State of Maharashtra, Department of Urban Development and Planning, thr. its Principal Secretary, Mumbai and another) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.R. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri D.P. Thakare, Addl. GP for Respondent No.1. Shri D.M. Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND ROHIT B.

DEO, JJ.

DATE: 5 th NOVEMBER, 2019.

Heard.

This petition questions the legality and validity of two resolutions passed by Municipal Council, Shegaon respondent No.2 on 12.10.2018, the numbers of which are respectively 2 and 35. The decisions so taken on the resolution have been forwarded to the respondent No.1 for approval. However, respondent No.1 has not taken any decision in the matter. We are of the view that purposes of the petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No.1. Accordingly, respondent No.1 is directed to decide the proposal received by Municipal Council, Shegaon in terms of resolutions 2 and 35, in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of the order. We also direct respondent No.1 to grant adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

wp8414.18.O.odt The petitioner would be at liberty to raise objections during the course of the hearing. The petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE NSN