Sandip S/O. Tukaram Komalwar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its P.S.O., P.S. Chikhaldara,

1 3aba880.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 880/2018 Sandip s/o Tukaram Komalwar V/s State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Chikhaldara Dist. Amravati (Gramin) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.R. Tekade, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Trupti Udeshi, APP for the non-applicant. CORAM : M.G. GIRATKAR, J DATE : 10.12.2018.

Heard Shri N.R. Tekade, learned counsel for the applicant.

Perused the First Information Report. It appears that the applicant was constantly demanding money for consuming liquor. He was beating the deceased. Deceased was employed in the Forest Department. It appears from the First Information Report that at the time of incident, the applicant was present. Looking to the reasons and findings of Sessions Court, he is not entitled for protection. Hence, the application is rejected.

JUDGE rkn