Kishor S/O Anandrao Umale v. Sau. Sandhya W/O Kishor Umale

1 cao89.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION [CAO] NO.89 OF 2019 IN MCA ST. [REVIEW] NO.28439 OF 2018 IN MCA [TR.] NO.1185 OF 2017 [Kishor s/o Anandrao Umale .vs. Sau. Sandhya w/o Kishor Umale] ....................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders ...................................................................................................................................... Shri D.G. Gawande, Advocate for applicant, Shri V.B. Gawali, Advocate for non-applicant. ..........

CORAM : MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.

DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2019.

Heard both the sides. Perused the application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, I am satisfied that the delay is properly explained and the same is hereby condoned, though objected by the learned advocate for the non-applicant, subject to costs of Rs.1,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Bar Association Library, Nagpur. Civil Application stands disposed of.

M.C.A. ST. [REVIEW] NO.28439/2018 Heard.

Issue notice to the non-applicant made returnable after two weeks.

Shri Gawali, learned advocate waives service of notice on behalf of the non-applicant.

Both the parties are directed to produce the relevant documents along with affidavit.

JUDGE Gulande