Bombay High CourtWP/1200/2019dismissedrule discharged

Gajanan S/O Shrawan Meshram v. Sau. Shantabai W/O Shriram Suryawanshi

2019-02-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp1200.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1200 OF 2019 (GAJANAN SHRAWAN MESHRAM...VS.. SAU. SHANTABAI SHRIRAM SURYAWANSHI.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.K.Thengri, Advocate for Petitioner.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 21, 2019.

The original defendant has challenged the order passed by the trial Court by which the application (Exh.103) filed by him for re-casting the issues is dismissed. The learned trial Judge has observed that the issue Nos. 1, 2 and 6 already framed cover the proposed draft issue and therefore, there is no need to recast the issues.

I have examined the issues framed by the trial Court on 17th February 2014. The observations of the learned trial Judge that, issue Nos.1, 2 and 6 cover the proposed draft issue, are proper. It cannot be said that the impugned order suffers from any error of jurisdiction.

The writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

JUDGE RRaut..