M/S. Arde Electricals, Thr. Its Partner, Sachin Zumber Arde v. State Of Maha., Thr. Principal Secy., Revenue And Forest Dept., Mumbai And ORS.

2025:BHC-NAG:90 1 13. CAO 1387 of 2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1387 OF 2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.27680 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.24916 OF 2024 M/S. ARDE ELECTRICALS, THR. ITS PARTNER, SACHIN ZUMBER ARDE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT., MUMBAI AND OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. B.N. Jaipurkar, Advocate for Applicant.

Mrs. M.S. Naik, AGP for Respondents-State.

CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.

DATED : 19th December 2025 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of writ petition, of which registration was refused for failure to remove the office objections. 3.

Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the delay of 171 days occurred since the applicant was not aware about the order of refusal of registration, and therefore, the delay is unintentional.

4.

Having regard to the contents of the application and submissions advanced, the application is allowed and the delay of 171 days in filing the application for restoration of writ petition is condoned, however, subject to costs of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three

2 13. CAO 1387 of 2025.odt Thousand Only), to be paid by the applicant to the Government Pleader's Library, Nagpur, within a period of two weeks from today. 5.

The civil application is accordingly disposed of. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.

27680 OF 2025 6.

This is an application for restoration of writ petition, of which registration is refused by order dated 28.04.2025, for non removal of the office objections within stipulated period. 7.

Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant/petitioner wants to contest the petition on merits and therefore, he seeks restoration of writ petition. 8.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application and submissions advanced, the application for restoration of writ petition is allowed. The order dated 28.04.2025, passed by the Registrar (Judicial), is quashed and set-aside. The applicant is directed to remove the office objections within a period of two weeks from today. On removal of the office objections, the writ petition be restored. 9.

In view of the above, the miscellaneous civil application is disposed of.

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) asd