Bombay High CourtWP/452/2019dismissedrule discharged

Rameswar S/O Phulkananr Suna And Another v. Union Of India, Thr. General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur

2019-01-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp452.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.452 OF 2019 (RAMESHWAR PHULKANANR SUNA & ANR ....VS.. UNION OF INDIA,THR. GM, BILASPUR (CG) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.B.Bambal, Advocate for Petitioners.

Ms Shweta Hanwate, Adv. h/f. Shri N.P.Lambat, Adv. for Respondent. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JANUARY 25, 2019.

Heard.

While allowing the claim petition the Railway Claims Tribunal directed that some amount receivable by the petitioners be kept in fixed deposit for the period of five years. Before expiry of the period of five years, the petitioners filed an application before the Tribunal seeking permission to withdraw the amount. This application is dismissed by the impugned order.

I find that the Tribunal has rightly appreciated the facts and the reasons recorded by the Tribunal in the penultimate paragraph of the impugned order, cannot be faulted with. Hence, I see no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

The petition is dismissed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE RRaut..