← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/41/2019admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Anantrao Kashiram Wathurkar v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Urban Development Dept. Mumbai And Others

2019-11-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale1 pages

1 cao41.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No.41/2019 in M.C.A. St. No.23284/18 (Anantrao Mathurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. O.Y. Kashid, Advocate for petitioner Smt. Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for respondents CORAM :MANISH PITALE, J.

DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2019 This is an application seeking restoration of the writ petition and for condonation of delay in moving the application for restoration.

2.

It appears that the writ petition stood dismissed due to failure on the part of the petitioner to remove office objections. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the office objections could not be removed within time due to the fact that the applicant is residing in remote place.

3.

Hence, for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay is condoned and the writ petition is directed to be restored subject to the petitioner removing office objections within a period of two weeks from today.

4.

List this writ petition on 13/12/2019.

JUDGE MP Deshpande