← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8388/2025disposed off

Prakash Narayanrao Bade And Others v. State Of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Rural Development And Water Conservation, Mumbai And ORS.

2025-12-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas2 pages

1 155wp8388.2025.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 8388 OF 2025 (Prakash Narayanrao Bade and ors Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Amol S. Chakotkar, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. K.P. Marpakwar, AGP for respondent No.1/State. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 24, 2025.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. According to him, though the petitioners, the retired teachers, employees of Zilla Parishad, are entitled for grant of arrears of additional house rent allowance, the respondents are not disbursing the arrears of the additional house rent allowance in their favour. The learned counsel further submits that the issue is covered by the various judgments of this Court including the judgment in Writ Petition No.3411 of 2024 delivered on 26.02.2025. 2.

Be that as it may, since the issue is not decided till date, we direct the respondent-Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, to treat this petition as representation and decide the same in the light of the observations made in the judgment cited supra within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of copy of this order. The counsel for the petitioner undertakes to produce copy of the writ petition along with the order passed today within two weeks before the concerned authority. 3.

Decision be communicated to the petitioners within a period of two weeks thereafter.

2 155wp8388.2025. 4.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J) (ANIL S.KILOR,J) RS Belkhede, PS