Raju Pralhad Navarkhed (In Jail) v. The Deputy Inspector General Prison(E.R.), Nagpur

1 wp1199.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1199 OF 2018 (RAJU PRALHAD NAVARKHED...VS.. D.I.G. PRISON (E)(R) & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Amol S. Chakotkar, Advocate (Appointed) Ms Nandita Tripathi, A.P.P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 19, 2019.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. has pointed out that the petitioner had applied for furlough leave by application dated 4th July 2018 on which the impugned order came to be passed, however, subsequently he was released on parole leave on 24th May 2019.

In view of the above facts, we are not inclined to entertain the grievance of the petitioner as after the decision on the application dated 4th July 2018, the petitioner was released on parole leave.

Hence, the petition is dismissed.

Fees of the Advocate appointed to represent the petitioner be paid as per the Rules.

JUDGE JUDGE RRaut..