← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/86/2026disposed off

Moil Janshakti Mazdoor Sangh, Balaghat (M.P./M.S.) Thr. President, Ramkripal L. Khurshel And ORS. v. Moil Limited, Nagpur, Thr. Chairman And Managing Director, Moil Ltd., Nagpur And ORS.

2026-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode2 pages

2026:BHC-NAG:111-DB 1 127-WP-86-26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO.86 OF 2026 MOIL Janshakti Mazdoor Sangh, Balaghat (MP/MS) Trade Union, Thr. President Ramkripal L. Khurshel, Tah. Tirodi, Dist. Balaghat and ors. vs.

MOIL Ltd. Thr. Chairman and Managing Director, MOIL Ltd. Nagpur and ors. - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - Shri A. K. Waghmare, Advocate for petitioners. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 6th January, 2026 Heard Shri A. K. Waghmare, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.

Petitioner No.1 is a registered trade union espousing the cause of petitioner Nos.2 to 6 and is seeking direction to the respondents through this Court for appointing the petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 on compassionate basis.

3.

The contention is that the case of the petitioners is governed by the settlement policy of the year 1984. The petitioners and especially the petitioner No.1 has already claimed such relief of appointment on compassionate basis with the respondents vide various representations which are placed on record at record page 152 onwards, Annexure-I.

4.

Shri A. K. Waghmare, learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement that the respondents have not decided the aforesaid representations and accordingly the claim of the petitioners for appointment on compassionate basis.

5.

Accordingly, we dispose of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to decide the representations

2 127-WP-86-26.odt of the petitioners at record page 152 onwards (Annexure-I) within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of this order in accordance with law.

6.

The respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to consider the representations so also the grounds raised in the present writ petition while taking decision thereon.

7.

The decision taken shall be communicated to the petitioners within a period of two weeks thereafter.

7.

With aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(Raj D. Wakode, J.) (Anil S. Kilor, J.) Asmita