Vandana Shirodkar., v. The State Of Goa, Thr. Police Inspector, Panaji Police Station, Panaji And ANR.,

1 crma6-18-06-06-18 Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.6/2018 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2017 Vandana Shirodkar.

..... Applicant.

V/s.

The State of Goa, through Police Inspector Panaji and another.

...... Respondents.

Mr. Vibhav Amonkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Pravin Faldessai, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondents.

Mr. Nigel Costa Frias with Ms. M. Correia, Advocate for the original Petitioner.

Coram : N.M. Jamdar & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 6 June 2018.

P.C.:

This application for intervention has been filed by the Applicant who is alleged as an accused in respect of the crime which is subject matter of the writ petition instituted by the PetitionerComplainant. 2.

The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that in view of certain directions as regards the flat in question, it is necessary to

2 crma6-18-06-06-18 hear the Applicant. The learned Counsel for the original Petitioner states that the Petitioner is not pressing the prayer clause (b) of the Petition which is in respect of the custody of the flat in question. The other prayers are regarding transfer of the investigation and certain disciplinary actions.

3.

In view of the categorical statement made by the learned Counsel for the original Petitioner, it is not necessary to entertain the Criminal Misc. Application. The Criminal Misc. Application is accordingly disposed of.

Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.

N.M. Jamdar, J.