Veronik Micronutrients Pvt. Ltd., Rep. By Its Director, Pramod S. Naik., v. Prakash Naik.,

20 WP 130 of 2017.doc Jose

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

GOA STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Sitting:- 11th February, 2023 Panel 1: SHRI JUSTICE N. A. BRITTO, (FORMER JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA) PRESIDING OFFICER & SHRI S.N. JOSHI, (ADVOCATE) MEMBER & MS. PREMA MATKAR, (ADVOCATE) MEMBER WRIT PETITION NO.130 OF 2017 VERONIK MICRONUTRIENTS PVT. LTD., REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, PRAMOD S. NAIK ... Petitioner

Versus

PRAKASH NAIK ... Respondent Mr. Mandar Naik h/f Mr. Prasanna Chawdikar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Respondent Mr. Prakash Naik present in person. M I N U T E S 1.

Petitioner is represented by Advocate Mr. Mandar Naik holding for Advocate Mr. Prasanna Chawdikar. Respondent is present in person. 2.

Learned Advocate Mr. Mandar Naik states that consent terms have been drawn and signed between both the parties. He has placed a copy of 11th February 2023

20 WP 130 of 2017.doc the same on record. Counsel further states that the Petitioner does not wish to pursue the petition filed by them. He further states that liberty be allowed to the Petitioner to withdraw the amount as per Clause 6 of the said consent terms. The Petitioner may withdraw the same.

3.

Nothing survives in the petition and the petition be treated as settled between the parties, as per the said consent terms. SHRI JUSTICE N. A. BRITTO, (FORMER JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA) PRESIDING OFFICER SHRI S.N. JOSHI, (ADVOCATE) MEMBER MS. PREMA MATKAR, (ADVOCATE) MEMBER 11th February 2023