Mr. Kashinath Jairam Shetye And ANR., v. Shri. Suresh Gaonkar The Police Inspector And 2 ORS.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2014 MR. KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND ANR., ... Petitioners
Versus
SHRI. SURESH GAONKAR THE POLICE INSPECTOR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Petitioner No.1 in person.
Mr. S. R. Rivankar, Public Prosecutor for the respondents. Coram:- C. V. BHADANG & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
Date:- 28th July, 2017 P.C.
The petitioner no.1, who appears in person, states that after the impugned order was passed, the police have investigated the complaint and closure report is filed before the learned Magistrate. Thus, according to petitioner no.1, nothing survives in the petition. He, therefore, submits that this matter be disposed of as infructuous.
2. We have also heard the learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent State.
3. In view of the fact that already the matter was investigated and closure report is filed and in view of the statement of the
WPCR/17/2014 petitioner no.1, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.
4. We have not examined the rival contentions of the parties. PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA