← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/167/2019disposed of

Dr. Santohs N. H., v. State Of Goa, Thr. The Chief Secretary And 3 ORS.,

2019-02-22The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak2 pages

1 wp167-19-22-02-19 Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.167/2019 Dr. Santosh N.H.

.... Petitioner.

Versus

State of Goa & others.

..... Respondents.

Mr. Abhijeet Kamat, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Dattaprasad Lawande, Advocate General with Mr. Deep Shirodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondent No.1 to 4.

CORAM:- CHIEF JUSTICE & M. S. SONAK, J.

Date:- 22 February 2019 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The Petitioner, in the present petition, prays for the following reliefs :

"a. Issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside the Order dated 26/07/2018 passed by the Respondent No.4, directing the Petitioner to join a post not commensurate with his educational qualifications.

b. Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to either offer his a post commensurate with his educational qualifications or to release him from the bond.

"

3. The learned Advocate General, on instructions, makes a

2 wp167-19-22-02-19 statement that in compliance of the impugned order, the Petitioner will be appointed as a Junior Consultant (Endocrinologist) in General Medicine Department by creating the post for the bond period. The order of appointment in that regard will be issued to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks. The statement is accepted. 4.

In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate General, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits the grievance raised by the Petitioner stands redressed. On issuance of such appointment order to the Petitioner, the order impugned in the Petition would stand automatically withdrawn. 5.

The Petition stands accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

M. S. SONAK, J.

CHIEF JUSTICE