← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/114/2023disposed of

People For Animals Goa Thr, Its President Norma Alvares v. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests And Chief Wildlife Warden And 7 ORS

2023-04-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes2 pages

907-MCA-114-23.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2023 IN PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 30 OF 2022 PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS GOA THR, ITS PRESIDENT NORMA ALVARES ... Applicant.

Versus

THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND CHIEF WILDLIFE WARDEN AND 7 ORS

...Respondents.

Ms Norma Alvares, with Mr Om D'Costa, Advocates for the Applicant.

Mr D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms Maria Correia, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 3. Mr S.S. Kantak, Senior Advocate with Mr Preetam Talaulikar, Advocate Respondent No.4.

Mr Ashwin D. Bhobe, with Ms Annelise Fernandes, Advocates for Respondent No.5.

Mr Abhijit Gosavi, Advocate for Respondent No.6. Mr Nigel Da Costa Frias, with Ms S. Nishad, Advocate for Respondent No.7.

Mr J.A. Lobo, Advocate for Respondent No.8. CORAM :

M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.

DATE :

19th APRIL 2023 P.C. :

1.

Heard Ms Alvares for the Applicant, learned Advocate General, who appears along with Ms Maria Correia, Addl. Govt. 19/04/23

907-MCA-114-23.DOC Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 3, Mr S.S. Kantak, learned Senior Advocate who appears along with Mr Talaulikar for Respondent No.4, Mr Bhobe for Respondent No.5, Mr Gosavi for Respondent No.6, Mr Costa Frias for Respondent No.7 and Mr Lobo for Respondent No.8.

2.

Mr Kantak states that Respondent No.4 has already appointed a Veterinary Doctor as detailed in paragraph 2 of the Affidavit filed by Respondent No.2. He states that Respondent No.4 will have no objection for granting prayer clauses (i) and (ii). Further, on instructions, he states that if any representative of the Petitioner wishes to accompany the Forest Department Officials, there would be no objection. Accordingly, the Forest Department to intimate the Petitioner.

3.

The learned Advocate General also states that the relief can be granted in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii). 4.

Accordingly, relief is granted in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii) and this Misc. Civil Application is disposed of. VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. M. S. SONAK, J. SANTOSH S MHAMAL Date: 2023.04.19 17:59:15 +05'30'

SANTOSH S MHAMAL 19/04/23