Pramod Laxmikant Cuncoliencar And 3 ORS v. Subhash S. Ekawade And 7 ORS

14-MCA-90-2021.DOC Suchitra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.90/2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.676/2018 PRAMOD LAXMIKANT CUNCOLIENCAR AND 3 ORS.

... APPLICANTS

Versus

SUBHASH S. EKAWADE AND 7 ORS.

... RESPONDENTS Mr A. Nachinolkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr Sarvesh Kamat Malyekar, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2.

CORAM:

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATED:

19th JANUARY 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr Nachinolkar for the applicants and Mr Malyekar for respondents no.1 and 2.

2.

Orders dated 11.03.2019 and 26.03.2019 are absolutely clear. Tere is no ambiguity whatsoever. Tis application seeking modification/clarification is entirely misconceived and deserves to be dismissed with costs. Possibly, this application is filed and kept pending to prejudice the proceedings before the Trial Court and 19th JANUARY 2024

14-MCA-90-2021.DOC to avoid giving details of the sale deeds by which the petitioners have further transferred the properties.

3.

Accordingly, this civil application is dismissed with costs. However, on the assurance of Mr Nachinolkar that the petitioners will comply with the orders within reasonable time, no costs are imposed.

4.

Misc. Civil Application No.90/2021 is disposed of. M. S. SONAK, J.

SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Date: 2024.01.22 15:11:45 +05'30'

SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL 19th JANUARY 2024