← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/385/2018disposed of

Shubhay Alais Shantaram Vivek Naik., v. The Goa Medical College, Thr. The Dean And 2 ORS.,

2018-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan3 pages

1 wp385-18 dt.29-11-18 Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.385 OF 2018 Mr. Shubhay alias Shantaram Vivek Naik, son of Vivek Naik, age 22 years, student.

Resident of Shriniketan, House No.1513/9/2, Alto Santa Cruz, P.O.

Bambolim Complex, Tiswadi, Goa. ..... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The Goa Medical College, through the Dean, having Office at the Goa Medical College Complex, Bambolim, Goa.

2. The Goa University, through the Registrar, having Office at the Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa.

3. The Controller of Examination, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa.

....... Respondents.

Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. A. Araujo, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. A. Jamadar, Additional Govt. Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. A. A. Agni, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sughandha Naik,

2 wp385-18 dt.29-11-18 Advocate for Respondents No.2 & 3.

Coram : R.M. Borde, & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 29 November 2018.

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per R.M. BORDE, J.) The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2-Goa University states that necessary amendment to OSC 4, more particularly Schedule OSC 4.23 which deals with the scheme of the Third Year MBBS Part II Examination, has been carried out and the same is in consonance with the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Maharashtra University of Health Sciences vs. Paryani Mukesh Jawaharlal and ors.,1. It is informed that the Executive Council of the University has taken a decision approving the amendment which needs further approval from the Chancellor of the University and the subject-matter is pending before the Chancellor. It is further informed that so far as the Petitioner is concerned, he was permitted to appear for the Examination and his results have already been declared and that he is pursuing his internship programme.

1 (2007) 10 SCC 201

3 wp385-18 dt.29-11-18 2.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition can be disposed of and the same is accordingly disposed of.

(Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.) (R.M. Borde, J.)