Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd., Thr. Its Aut. Rep., Sheikh Abodin v. North Goa Planning And Development Authority, Panaji And 2 ORS

911-WP 195-21.DOC Amrut

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.195 OF 2021 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD., THR. ITS AUT. REP., SHEIKH ABODIN ... Petitioner

Versus

GREATER PANAJI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 ORS.

...Respondents

Mr. Prasad Dani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi Gawas and Mr. S. Reyaz, Advocates for the Petitioner.

Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms. S. Mordekar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

Mr. S. Karpe and Mr. A. Sawant, Advocates for Respondent No.1.

CORAM:

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & M. S. SONAK, JJ DATED:

4th August 2021 P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Mr. Dani, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner based on the instructions submits that the Petitioner, for the present, will be satisfied if the directions are issued to the Assessing Officer, Greater Panaji Planning and Development 4th August 2021

911-WP 195-21.DOC Authority to dispose of the representation dated 10.12.2018 ( page 40 of the paper book ) and the representation dated 07.08.2019 ( page 39 of the paper book) in accord with the law and on its own merits expeditiously.

3.

Mr. Karpe, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Member Secretary, on instructions, states that such representations will be disposed of on their own merits within eight weeks from today.

4.

All contentions of all parties are expressly left open since we have not adverted to the rival contentions on merits. 5.

The petition is disposed of by accepting Mr. Karpe's statement and directing the Assessing Officer to act accordingly. M. S. SONAK, J SUNIL P. DESHMUKH , J Date: 2021.08.06 11:06:14 +05'30'

TARI AMRUT NAGESH 4th August 2021