← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/38/2023disposed of

Manisha Ramnath Naik v. Rekha Dattaram Naik

2024-10-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

2024:BHC-GOA:1868 SA 38 of 2023 Amrut

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

SECOND APPEAL NO.38 OF 2023 MANISHA RAMNATH NAIK ... APPELLANT

Versus

REKHA DATTARAM NAIK ... RESPONDENT Mr Abhishek Sawant, Advocate for the appellant under the Legal Aid Scheme.

Ms Namrata Gawde, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATED :- 25th October, 2024 P.C.:

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not wish to press the Second Appeal as it is his contention that once the order has been passed by the trial Court holding the issue of limitation against the appellant, it is for the appellant to take appropriate steps challenging the order of the trial Court.

2. Learned counsel Ms Gawde opposed this request. However, it is at the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order dated 30.07.2024 of the trial Court before the 25th October, 2024

SA 38 of 2023 appropriate Court. I have not heard the parties on the merits of the contentions in this appeal. The Second Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

M. S. KARNIK, J.

Signed by: AMRUT NAGESH TARI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 25/10/2024 16:42:00 25th October, 2024