Anil Laximan Ghadi., v. Bhikaji Babusso Naik Satardekar.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2015 ANIL LAXIMAN GHADI., ... Applicant

Versus

BHIKAJI BABUSSO NAIK SATARDEKAR., ... Respondent Shri S.P. Munj h/f. Shri Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Ashwin D. Bhobe, Advocate for the respondents No.1a, 1c to 1k.

Coram:- NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

Date:- 23rd January 2019 P.C.:

Having considered the application and the reply on record and that the delay in bringing the legal representatives is duly accounted, the same is allowed. The applicant to carry out the necessary corrections in the cause title forthwith.

2. Shri Munj, learned Advocate submits that the proposed legal representative 1(b) has expired whose widow and mother are already on record as the respondents No.1a and 1c. He placed the copy of the Death Certificate on record.

3. In view thereof, the applicant to carry out the necessary

MCA/156/2018 changes in the cause title forthwith.

4. The application stands disposed off accordingly. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

mv