Shri Vijayanand V. Naik. v. Mrs. Pratiksha Prakash Naik.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2016 IN APPLN. FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR NO. 23 OF 2015 SHRI VIJAYANAND V. NAIK.

... Applicant

Versus

MRS. PRATIKSHA PRAKASH NAIK.

... Respondent Mr. Jatin Ramaiya, Advocate for the Applicant. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J.

Date:- 5th August, 2016 P.C.

Heard.

2. This is an application for substitute service on the Respondent. It is stated that as per the Bailiff report, the Respondent is not available at the given address.

3. Hence, the application is allowed. The Applicant is allowed to serve the Respondent by substitute service in addition to other service.

4. Application stands disposed of.

F. M. REIS, J.

arp/*