← Library
Bombay High CourtTXA/58/2006infructuos

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji-Goa. v. Damodar Mangalji Mining Co., Panaji-Goa.

2019-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Nutan D. Sardessai1 pages

1 txa58-06.dt.16-7-19 Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

TAX APPEAL NO.58 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ....

Appellant.

Versus

Damodar Mangalji Mining Company.

....

Respondent.

Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram : M.S. Sonak & Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ.

Date : 16th July, 2019.

P.C.:- Ms. Linhares, learned Standing Counsel for the Appellant fairly states that the relief in the present Appeal has been rendered infructuous, in view of the decision of this Court dated 23rd June, 2009 in Tax Appeal No.8/2004, which was in fact a connected matter. Ms. V. Palyekar, learned Counsel for the Respondent also supports the submission made by Ms. Linhares and urges disposal of this Appeal on the ground that the same has been rendered infructuous.

2.

Accordingly, this Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. Nutan D. Sardessai, J. M.S. Sonak, J.