← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/375/2024disposed of

Nitesh Bhadu Naik v. State Of Goa Thr. Its Chief Secretary And 7 ORS

2024-12-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. Mehta2 pages

WP 375 of 2024 vinita

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.375 OF 2024 NITESH BHADU NAIK ... PETITIONER

Versus

STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 7 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Ms A. Fernandes, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr Geetesh Shetye, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No.1,2,4,5 and 8.

Mr Rama G. Rivankar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr K. Kavlekar, Advocates for Respondent No.6 through VC. Mr Manish Salkar, Advocate for Respondent No.7. CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.

DATED :- 4th December, 2024 P.C.

Complaint against illegal construction has been filed before the Village Panchayat.

2. Learned counsel for the Village Panchayat/respondent no. 3 states that show cause notice has already been issued on the basis of the complaint dated 11.1.2024 and the same will be taken to its logical conclusion within a period of six weeks from today. Statement accepted.

3. Furthermore against the order of demolition, a Panchayat Appeal is filed. Details of which are mentioned in the prayer clause (b) of the 4th December, 2024

WP 375 of 2024 petition.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, we request the Director of Panchayat to decide the appeal expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date this order is placed before it.

5. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate further pointed out that the appeal is pending before the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority(GCZMA) for hearing. We request GCZMA to decide the appeal expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from today.

6. Petition stands disposed of. No costs. NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.

M. S. KARNIK, J.

Signed by: VINITA VIKAS NAIK Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 05/12/2024 17:39:26 4th December, 2024