← Library
Bombay High CourtELEP/2/2017dismissed for default

Gautam N. Pednekar And ANR., v. The Election Commission Of India Thr. Its Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi And 43.,

2018-02-02Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Nutan D. Sardessai1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

ELECTION PETITION NO. 2 OF 2017 GAUTAM N. PEDNEKAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners

Versus

THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THR. ITS CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, NEW DELHI AND 43., ... Respondents None for the Petitioners.

Shri S.R. Rivankar, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Shri A. Jamadar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

Shri S. N. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent No.4. Shri S.P. Munj h/f. Shri D.J. Pangam, Advocate for the Respondents No.6, 27 and 42.

Ms. K. Pednekar, Advocate for the Respondents No.5, 8, 16, 17, 18, 22, 25, 26, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38,39, 40 and 44. Shri P. Vernekar, Advocates for the Respondents No.7, 10-14, 19-21, 24, 28-31, 34, 36, 41 and 43.

Shri S.D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Respondent No.9. Shri C.A. Ferreira, Advocate for the Respondent No.22. Coram:- NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

Date:- 2nd February 2018 P.C.:

It is seen that the petitioners have been constantly remaining absent form 30th November 2017. In view thereof, proceedings are dismissed for non-prosecution.

NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

mv