Kashinath Jairam Shetye., v. Bharat Nigalye.,

1 mca85-11dt.2.8.19 Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO.11 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.761 OF 2018 Kashinath Jairam Shetye.

.... Applicant.

Versus

Bharat Nigalye.

.... Respondent.

Petitioner in person.

Mr. D. J. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Shailesh Redkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondent.

Coram : M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 2nd August, 2019.

P.C. :

Heard Mr. Kashinath Shetye, the Petitioner in person and Mr. D.J. Pangam, the learned Advocate General for the Respondent. 2.

Mr. Pangam, the learned Advocate General states that the information which the Respondent is required to furnish to the Petitioner in terms of our order dated 9th January, 2019, will be positively furnished to the Petitioner today itself, before 5.30 p.m. This statement is accepted.

2 mca85-11dt.2.8.19 3.

In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Shetye states that he is not pressing this Contempt Petition. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of.

Prithviraj K. Chavan, J. M.S. Sonak, J.