← Library
Bombay High CourtCRA/2/2023infructuos

Rehan Abdul Shaikh And ANR v. Roshan Nazir Sayed @ Roshan Ara Beigum @ Roshan Nazir Saiad And 65 ORS

2025-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak2 pages

CRA 2 of 2023 Niti

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2023 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2023 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2023 REHAN ABDUL SHAIKH AND ANR ... APPLICANTS

Versus

ROSHAN NAZIR SAYED @ ROSHAN ARA BEIGUM @ ROSHAN NAZIR SAIAD AND 65 ORS ... RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2023 REHAN ABDUL SHAIKH AND ANR ... APPLICANTS

Versus

ROSHAN NAZIR SAYED @ ROSHAN ARA BEIGUM @ ROSHAN NAZIR SAIAD AND 65 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Mr R.G. Ramani, Senior Advocate with Mr Pranav Kakodkar, Advocate for the Applicants.

CORAM:- M. S. SONAK, J.

DATED :- 17th July, 2025 P.C.:

Heard Mr R.G. Ramani, the learned Senior Counsel along with Mr P. Kakodkar for the applicants/petitioners.

2. Mr Ramani fairly points out that the challenge in this petition was to the order rejecting the petitioners' application for rejection for the plaint, and now, since the plaintiffs have withdrawn the suit on 17th July, 2025

CRA 2 of 2023 28.05.2024, the reliefs in this revision application are rendered infructuous.

3. Accordingly, this revision is disposed of as infructuous. Nothing survives in the civil application and hence the civil application also stands disposed of.

M. S. SONAK, J.

Signed by: NITI KISHOR HALDANKAR Designation: Private Secretary Date: 18/07/2025 16:39:29 17th July, 2025