Rohan Shrikant Joshi., v. State Of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary And 2 ORS.,

08-PILWP-16-17.DOC Andreza

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 16 OF 2017 Rohan Shrikant Joshi

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Goa

...Respondents

Mr SN Joshi Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr D Lawande, Advocate General with Mr P Dangui, Addl Government Advocate for the Respondents.

CORAM:

G.S. PATEL & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ DATED:

10th October 2017 PC:- 1.

In view of the affidavit in reply and the affidavit in rejoinder, we do not believe that a further Order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is possible. We will, however, leave it open to the Petitioners to place before the State Government and its various Departments such suggestions as it may have in regard to addressing the problem pointed out.

2.

We have no doubt that the State Government will consider these suggestions on their merits and frame suitable remedial measures that are practicable and enforceable. 10th October 2017

08-PILWP-16-17.DOC 3.

With these observations, the Petition is disposed off with no orders as to costs.

NUTAN D. SARDESSAI J.

G. S. PATEL J.

10th October 2017