← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/219/2023disposed of

Dr. Manoj Kumar Midha v. State Of Goa Thr. Chief Secretary And ANR

2023-07-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Bharat P. Deshpande3 pages

Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 213/2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2509/2022(F) DR. GANESH MADHAVRAO JADHAV ...Applicant.

Versus

STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR

...Respondents.

Mr Yogesh Nadkarni, with Ms S. Khadilkar, Advocates for the Applicant.

Mr D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms Akshata Bhat, Additional Govt. Advocate for the Respondents. WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1540/2023(F) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2509/2022(F) STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR ..... Applicants

Versus

DR. GANESH MADHAVRAO JADHAV ..... Respondent. Mr D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms Akshata Bhat, Additional Govt. Advocate for the Applicants. Mr Y.V. Nadkarni, with Ms S. Khadilkar, Advocate for the Respondent.

WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 219/2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2531/2022(F) DR. MANOJ KUMAR MIDHA. ..... Applicant .

Versus

STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR ..... Respondent.

Mr Yogesh Nadkarni, with Ms S. Khadilkar, Advocates for the Applicant.

Mr D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms Akshata Bhat, Additional Govt. Advocate for the Respondents. WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541/2023(F) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2531/2022(F) STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR ..... Applicants

Versus

DR. MANOJ KUMAR MIDHA ..... Respondent. Mr D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms Akshata Bhat, Additional Govt. Advocate for the Applicants. Mr Y.V. Nadkarni, with Ms S. Khadilkar, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM :

M. S. SONAK & BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE :

18th July 2023 P.C. :

1.

By our order dated 20/2/2023, we had directed the Respondents to take a decision on the invocation of the bonds furnished by the original Petitioners within three months. Te Applicants-original Respondents now seek extension of further three months.

2.

Te learned Advocate General states that the initial period of three months expired on 20/5/2023. Terefore, if the extension of one month is now granted, a decision will positively be taken in the matter.

3.

Te reasons stated in the Applications is that Dr. Mahesh Kamble, Joint Director, Academics, who was well versed with the

matter was unavailable and finally relieved from his duties on 8/3/2023. Te Applicants states that the other officials who could have looked into the matter were also involved in PG Examinations. 4.

Considering the explanation offered, extension of one month from today is granted. However, we clarify if within one month no decision is taken then, the original Petitioners would be at liberty to withdraw the amounts deposited by them in this Court, with accrued interest, if any.

5.

Misc. Civil Applications are disposed of.

BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. M. S. SONAK, J. by SANTOSH S MHAMAL Date: 2023.07.18 19:32:59 +05'30'

SANTOSH S MHAMAL