← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/29/2022disposed of

Betty Martins v. Joaquim R. Antao And 6 ORS

2023-04-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

CA 29 of 2022 Maria S.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.29 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.31 OF 2022 BETTY MARTINS ... APPLICANT

Versus

JOAQUIM R. ANTAO AND 6 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Mr A. F. Diniz, Senior Advocate with Mr Anthony Joseph S. Furtado, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr R. G. Ramani, Senior Advocate with Mr Pranav Kakodkar, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 and 2.

CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATED :- 6th April, 2023 P.C.

Heard learned Senior Advocate, Shri A. F. Diniz for the applicant and Shri R. G. Ramani, learned Senior Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2.

2. The appeal is already admitted. Shri Diniz, learned Senior Advocate on instructions submits that the applicant will deposit in this Court the arrears till date within a period of 8 weeks from today and, thereafter, continue to deposit the mesne profit every 6 months in advance.

6th April, 2023

CA 29 of 2022

3. Further, a statement is made by Shri Diniz, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions of the applicant, that no third party rights or interest in the property or any encumbrance will be created and that the applicant will not induct any third party or part with possession of the property during the pendency of the First Appeal.

4. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) subject to the above.

M. S. KARNIK, J.

MARIA SUZANA REBELLO SUZANA REBELLO Date: 2023.04.06 15:35:13 +05'30'

6th April, 2023