Radha Kalro v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And ANR.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.440 OF 2014 RADHA KALRO ...

Petitioner VS THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

...

Respondents Mr. R. G. Rivankar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Amira Razaq, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- M. S. SONAK & SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ.

Date : 6th May 2021 P.C.

Heard Mr. R. Rivankar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms. A. Razaq, learned counsel for the Respondents. 2.

Mr. Rivankar, on instructions, from the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition since, the Petitioner, has already paid the demanded amount under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the rules made thereunder.

3.

Ms. Razaq, learned counsel for the Respondents states that she will have to verify the position as to whether the payments have actually made.

4.

According to us, since, the Petitioner makes a solemn statement that such amounts have already been paid and only wishes to withdraw this petition, we see no difficulty in granting the Petitioner leave to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, this petition is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such.

SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

M.S. SONAK, J.

at* TARI AMRUT NAGESH NAGESH Date: 2021.05.07 10:50:25 +05'30'