Dnyaneshwar Budhu Vaigankar And 2 ORS v. The State Of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary And 6 ORS

2-WP-443-21.DOC Suchitra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.443/2021 DNYANESHWAR BUDHU VAIGANKAR AND 2 ORS.

...PETITIONERS

Versus

THE STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 ORS.

...RESPONDENTS None for the Petitioners.

Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Deep Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent-State.

CORAM:

DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & M. S. SONAK, J.

DATED:

3rd August 2022 P.C.:

1.

None appears for the petitioners.

2.

It appears that on five previous occasions, adjournments were prayed for on behalf of the petitioners and the same were granted. It is clear that the petitioners are not interested in pressing this PIL writ petition.

3.

That apart, from the pleadings as well as prayer clause (a), we find that the cause of action for moving this PIL writ petition 3rd August 2022

2-WP-443-21.DOC arose sometime in the year 2010. The Court has been belatedly approached.

4.

In view of the above, the PIL writ petition stands dismissed for default.

5.

No costs.

M. S. SONAK, J.

CHIEF JUSTICE SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Date: 2022.08.04 10:59:11 +05'30'

3rd August 2022