Raghuvir Dattaram Bhise v. Linete Matildinha Martins And 9 ORS

39-WP-78-22.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.78 OF 2022 RAGHUVIR DATTARAM BHISE .... APPLICANT.

Versus.

LINETE MATILDINHA MARTINS AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS.

Mr. Gajendra Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Sulekha Kamat, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondent No.1, 3 and 4.

Ms. Sowmya Drago, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM :

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE : 26 th August 2022 P.C. : - 1.

Heard Mr. Usgaonkar for the Applicant, Ms. Kamat for Respondents No.1, 3 and 4 and Ms. Sowmya Drago for Respondent No.2.

2.

For the reasons set out in the Civil Application, the delay of 36 days is condoned and leave is granted to bring on record the legal representatives of Respondent No.8.

26th August 2022

39-WP-78-22.DOC 3.

Necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks. After the amendment is carried out, issue notice to the legal representatives, returnable after four weeks.

4.

Civil Application stands disposed of.

M. S. SONAK, J.

SANTOSH S MHAMAL SANTOSH S MHAMAL Date: 2022.08.29 10:29:29 +05'30'

26th August 2022