Shyam Gawas, Presently At Modern Central Jail Colvale., v. The Inspector General Of Prisons, Panaji And ANR.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 110 OF 2018 Shyam Gawas, 49 years of age, Prisoner No.94/12, Presently serving sentence at Modern Central Jail, Colvale, Goa.

...Petitioner

V e r s u s

1. The Inspector General of Prisons, 1st Floor, Old Education Building, 18th June Road, St. Inez, Panaji- Goa.

2. Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, AG's Office, High Court, Panaji-Goa.

...Respondents

Mr. T. George John, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr Mahesh Amonkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the Respondents.

Coram :

N.M. Jamdar & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ Date:

18 June 2018 P.C.

1.

Heard Mr. T. George John, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Respondents. 2.

The Petitioner has sought relaxation of the condition of parole to the extent of deposit of 25,000/- and a surety bond of ₹ like amount.

3.

We have seen the order passed granting parole. The Petitioner is granted parole by executing a personal bond in Form II of 25,000/- and surety bond of Form-I of 25,000/-. Form I ₹ ₹ and Form II, which have been appended to the Goa Prisons Rules 2006, do not state that cash amount needs to be deposited but these personal bonds come into operation in case of default, which position is also clarified by the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

4.

The Petitioner is proceeding on this basis that the Petitioner is required to deposit a cash amount of 25,000/- as a pre- ₹ condition for release and, consequently, is seeking reduction to 10,000/-. There is no statement in the Petition nor it is asserted ₹ by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner does not know anyone in the State of Goa, of which he is a local resident, who can give a surety bond of 25,000/- or who has ₹ property worth of 25,000/- to be recovered from the same in ₹ case of default.

5.

Therefore, at this stage, we are not inclined to interfere in this writ jurisdiction as the conditions of parole are clear that all that the Petitioner has to do is to submit Form I and Form II and if they are so submitted to the satisfaction of the Authority, the question of deposit of cash does not arise.

6.

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.

N. M. Jamdar, J.