← Library
Bombay High CourtCPM/42/2014disposed of

Goa-Idc Staff Welfare Association Rep. Thr. Its President Shri Uday M. Rege And ANR., v. Goa Industrial Development Corporation Rep Thr. Its Managing Director Shri S.V. Naik And ANR.,

2015-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. L. Wadane,F. M. Reis2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CONTEMPT PETITION (MAIN) NO. 42 OF 2014 GOA-IDC STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION REP. THR. ITS PRESIDENT SHRI UDAY M. REGE AND ANR., ... Petitioners

Versus

GOA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REP THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI S.V. NAIK AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Arunkumar V. Nigalye, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nikhil Pai, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. S. Rebello, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent No.3.

Coram:- F. M. REIS & K. L. WADANE, JJ.

Date:- 31st August, 2015 P.C.:

Heard Mr. Arunkumar V. Nigalye, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Nikhil Pai, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 and Mr. S. Rebello, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No.3.

2. The grievance of the petitioner, in the above contempt petition, is that the directions issued by this Court by an order dated 22/09/2011 are not being complied with.

3. Mr. Pai, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2, upon instructions, states that the respondents shall comply

CPM/42/2014 with the order dated 22/09/2011 within three months from today.

4. Mr. A. Nigalye, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, states that accepting the said statement of Mr. Pai, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 upon instructions, the contempt petition may be disposed of.

5. Hence, accepting the statement of Mr. Pai, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 upon instructions, contempt petition stands disposed of.

K. L. WADANE, J.

F. M. REIS, J.

ssm.