Shri. Nagu Gopinath Naik And ANR. v. Shri. Madhu Gopinath Naik.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 564 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2008 SHRI. NAGU GOPINATH NAIK AND ANR.

... Applicant

Versus

SHRI. MADHU GOPINATH NAIK.

... Respondent Ms. Vinita Vishram Palyekar, Advocate for the applicants. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J.

Date:- 15th July, 2016 P.C.

This is an application for speaking to the minutes.

2. It is pointed out that at para 3 of the order dated 28.08.2015 the appellant no.(ii) Shailesh Dessai is shown to be the representative of the respondent when in fact he is the representative of the appellant no.2. Hence, the application is allowed. The word "respondent" stands deleted from line 6 of para 3 and the word "appellant no.2" shall be inserted. Registry to carry out necessary corrections.

3. The application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J.

at*