J.M. Baxi And Company, Thr. Its Const. Attorney, Sushil Mathur., v. Veressimo Fernandes And 10 ORS.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 555 OF 2018 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1533 OF 2018 J.M. BAXI AND COMPANY, THR. ITS CONST. ATTORNEY, SUSHIL MATHUR., ... Applicant

Versus

VERESSIMO FERNANDES AND 10 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Parag S Rao, Advocate for the applicant. Shri E. Dias, Advocate for the respondents No.2 to 5, 10 and 11. Coram:- NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

Date:- 14th December 2018 P.C.:

Shri Rao, learned Advocate undertakes to place the authorisation of the applicant on record by 17/12/2018.

2. In view thereof, one of the preliminary objections raised to the condonation of delay application is squarely met by Shri P. Rao, learned Advocate. Other conditions on the maintainability of the revision application are left open. Delay is accordingly condoned.

3. The application accordingly stands disposed off.

4. The registry to register the revision application. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

mv