Zenito Cardozo v. State Through Pp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2016 ZENITO CARDOZO ... Applicant

Versus

STATE THROUGH PP ... Respondent Shri Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri P. Faldessai, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent. Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J.

Date:- 5th August, 2016 P.C.:

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

2. The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II and Section 326 of IPC. Under Section 304 Part II of IPC, the applicant has been sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and for the offence punishable under Section 326 of IPC, he has been sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for three months.

3. The record discloses that the applicant was on bail during the course of the trial. In such circumstances, on hearing the parties, the

CRMA/156/2016 following order is passed:

(i) The substantive sentence of imprisonment is hereby suspended pending disposal of the appeal on condition that the applicant shall furnish a PR bond of Rs.15,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount.

(ii) The applicant shall deposit the amount of fine within a period of one week.

(iii) Bail bonds to be furnished before the learned Sessions Judge.

4. Expedite authenticated copy of the order. C. V. BHADANG, J.

NH