State Of Goa, Rep. By Executive Engineer, Pwd, Works Division Vi (Nh), Panaji., v. M.S. U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd.,

22-MCA-809-16.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.809 OF 2016 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2234 OF 2016 STATE OF GOA, REP. BY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD, WORKS DIVISION VI (NH), PANAJI., .... APPLICANT.

Versus.

M.S. U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD., ....RESPONDENT.

Mr. Manish Salkar, Government Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Shivan Desai, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM :

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE :

th June 2022 P.C. : - 1.

The learned Counsel for the parties state that this appeal will lie before the Single Judge.

2.

There is a delay of 38 days in filing the appeal. Though the condonation of delay is opposed by the Respondent, I find that sufficient cause has been shown to condone this delay. In 10th June 2022

22-MCA-809-16.DOC particular, reference is necessary to the cause shown in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the application.

3.

Accordingly, the delay of 38 days in filing this Appeal is, hereby, condoned.

4.

Misc. Civil Application No.809 of 2016 is disposed of. M. S. SONAK, J.

10th June 2022