Communidade Of Serula, Thr. Its Treasures, Mr. Alex P.S. Pereira., v. Union Of India, Thr. The Secretary And 2 ORS.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO. 724 OF 2017 Communidade of Serula, through its Treasurer, Alex P. S. Pereira, having its office at West Coast Residency, 1st Floor, Opp. Bank of India, Porvorim, Bardez Goa. 403 521 ... Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi,

2. State of Goa, through its Chief Secretary, having office at Secretariat, Porvorim Goa.

3. Special Land Acquisition Officer, PWD National Highways, Altinho, Panaji Goa.

... Respondents Mr. Yogesh V. Nadkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dattaprasad Lawande, Advocate General with Mr. P. Faldessai, Addl. Government Advocate for the respondent nos.2 & 3.

Coram:- F. M. REIS & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.

Date:- 9th August, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT ( Per F. M. Reis, J ) Heard Mr. Y. Nadkarni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dattaprasad Lawande, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2.

Rule. Heard forthwith with the consent of the learned counsel.

3.

The learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 waives service.

4.

The short grievance of the petitioner in the above petition is essentially that the copy of the plan depicting the land acquired has not been furnished to the petitioner nor the inspection thereof was given to the petitioner by the respondent no.3.

5.

Mr. Dattaprasad Lawande, learned Advocate General however points out that the respondent no.3 shall furnish a copy of such plan as well as the inspection thereof within three weeks from today in terms of the request in the letter dated 06.08.2017 at para

5. The learned Advocate General also points out that the date of inspection of such documents shall be intimated to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner within one week. Accepting the said statement of the learned Advocate General, we find that the grievance of the petitioner stands worked out at this stage. Rule stands disposed off accordingly. All contentions of the parties are left open. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

F. M. REIS, J.

at*