Devendra Raghuraj Deshprabhu And 3 ORS., v. Tukaram Swar (Dec) Thr. Lrs. And 5 ORS.,
Niti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.662 OF 2019
1. Shri Devendra Raghuraj Deshprabhu, age 67 years.
2. Mrs Sunita Devendra Deshprabhu, age 61 years, Both residents of House No.4/68, Nanerwada, Pernem Goa.
3. Shri Jitendra Raghuraj Deshprabhu, age 62 years (deceased represented through LRs) 3.a Ms. Mrinalini Jitendra Deshprabhu, daughter of late Jitendra Deshprabhu, aged 34 years, unmarried, Resident of Nanerwada, Pernem Goa.
3.b Mast. Yuvraj Jitendra Deshprabhu, Son of late Jitendra Deshprabhu, Age 11 Years, (Minor), Resident Of Nanerwada, Pernem Goa.
4. Mrs. Rupa Jitendra Deshprabhu, age 56 years, Both residents of House No. 4/68, Nanerwada, Pernem Goa.
....PETITIONERS
Versus
1. Tukaram Swar (Since Deceased), Through Legal Heirs 1(A) Vilasini Swar, age 80 years (since dec.) 1(B) Ramanand Swar, age 60 years,
1(C) Premanand Swar, age 52 years, All residents of Mausawda, Pernem, Goa.
2. Shri Rajaji Balkrishna Deshprabhu, age 70 years, Resident Of Nanerwada, Pernem, Goa.
3. Mrs. Anjalika Raghunathrau Prabhu Dessai Deshprabhu alias Shilpa Satish Ugrankar, age 65 years,
4. Mr. Satish Shripad Ugrankar, age 70 years, both Respondent No.3 And 4 residents Of H.No. 2A, Ram Mahal, J.N. Tata Road, Bombay.
5. Mrs. Achaladevi Raghunathrau Prabhu Desai Deshprabhu alias Devika Dilip Kulkarni, age 65 years,
6. Shri Dilip Mahabal Kulkami, age 69 years, both Respondent No.5 And 6 Residents Of H. No. 23 B, New Neelsagar Co-Operative Housing Society 2, A/B Perry Cross Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai 400 050.
....RESPONDENTS Mr P. Vaze, Advocates the Petitioners.
Mr Deepak Gaonkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1(B) and 1(C).
CORAM:
M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE :
19th JANUARY 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1 (2013) 12 SCC 649
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
2 (1998) 7 SCC 123
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
3 (1998) 7 SCC 123 4 (2008) 8 SCC 321
21.
22.
23.
24.
₹15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) within four weeks from today. Such costs can be deposited in this Court within four weeks from where the petitioners can withdraw the same by providing their bank details. However, if such costs are not deposited within four weeks from today, then, the application for condonation of delay and restoration made before the Tribunal shall be deemed to have been dismissed and the proceedings in Mundkar Revision Application no.50/2005 shall terminate.
25.
26.
27.
28.
M. S. SONAK, J.
NITI K HALDANKAR Date: 2024.01.23 11:00:52 +05'30'
NITI K HALDANKAR