Bombay High CourtWP/854/2018disposed of

Sudhakar Venku Tari And 3 ORS., v. Madho Rama Tari (Dec) Thr. Lrs. And 21 ORS.,

2022-10-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni2 pages

WP 854 of 2018 Esha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.854 OF 2018 SUDHAKAR VENKU TARI AND 3 ORS., ... PETITIONERS

Versus

MADHO RAMA TARI (DEC) THR. LRS.

AND 21 ORS., ... RESPONDENTS Mr. Jagannath J. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms. S. Shaikh, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6(a) to 6(e) and 7. Mr. Vibhav R. Amonkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1(i) to 1(iv), 2(a), 2(f), 2(g), 10, 13(a) and 14.

CORAM:- G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATED :- 12th October, 2022 P.C.

It is informed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that Regular Civil Appeal No. 271/2010, on which the impugned order has been passed itself has been dismissed for want of prosecution and as such, the present Petition has become infructuous.

2. Petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

3. However, it is clarified that the petitioners shall have liberty to revive the Petition, in the event, in future, a situation 12th October, 2022

WP 854 of 2018 arises that the issue in the present proceedings is required to be re-agitated.

G. S. KULKARNI, J.

VAIGANKAR ESHA SAINATH Date: 2022.10.12 18:39:17 +05'30'

VAIGANKAR ESHA SAINATH 12th October, 2022