← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/586/2023disposed of

Medha Madan Chodankar And 5 ORS v. Home Shoppe Pvt. Ltd Rep By Its Md Savio Gracias And 3 ORS

2024-04-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes2 pages

MCA 586 of 2023 Sonam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.586 OF 2023 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.2140 OF 2023 (F) MEDHA MADAN CHODANKAR AND 5 ORS ... APPLICANTS

Versus

HOME SHOPPE PVT. LTD REP BY ITS MD SAVIO GRACIAS AND 3 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Ms. P. Volvoikar with Ms Sailee Kenny, Advocates for the Applicants.

Mr. S. N. Joshi with Swapna Shashikant Joshi, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4.

CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES, J.

DATED :- 18th April, 2024 P. C.:

1. This is an application for condonation of 30 days delay in filing Civil Revision application. The grounds stated in this application are that the learned Advocate for the Petitioner was under bonafide intention that Writ Petition is maintainable and no limitation would apply for filing this proceedings.

2. However, at a later date, when it was realized that Revision Proceeding was maintainable, the same was filed citing the bonafide reasons.

18th April, 2024

MCA 586 of 2023

3. The application is being opposed by the Respondents. However, considering bonafide reason shown and that the application is supported by an affidavit of the Applicants which states these facts in the application, delay needs to be condoned. For that reason, the application is allowed and delay of 30 days in filing Revision Application is condoned. Let the CRA 2140/2023(F) be registered and placed on the admission board on 20/06/2024.

VALMIKI MENEZES, J.

18th April, 2024