Sagun Babu Malik., v. State Of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary And 2 ORS.,
vinita - 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NOS. 775 OF 2017, 793 OF 2017, 794 OF 2017 AND 805 OF 2017.
WRIT PETITION NO. 775 OF 2017, Mangesh Gurudas Naik, ... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 ors.
... Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 793 OF 2017.
Ulhas P. Velip ... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 ors.
... Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 794 OF 2017.
Vijendra Divkar , ... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 ors.
... Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 805 OF 2017.
Sagun Babu Malik ... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 ors.
... Respondents,
vinita - 2 - Mr. D. Zaveri, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate General with Mr. A. Jamadar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the Respondents.
Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate General with Mr. S. Dhargalkar. Addl. Govt. Advocate for the Respondents in Writ Petition No.805 of 2017. Coram:- N. M. JAMDAR & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
Date:- 19 June 2018 P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
2.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after hearing the arguments, we had indicated to the Petitioner that it is not possible for us to issue Writ of Mandamus as sought for in view of the legal position.
3.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition to approach the State Government with a representation as he states that the State Government has power for regularisation of the services if a stipulated period is completed by those who are working on temporary/contract basis. It is open for the Petitioner to do. If an representation is made by the Petitioner within a period of two weeks, State will consider the same as per law and as per decisions of the Apex Court.
vinita - 3 - 4.
Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. N. M. JAMDAR, J.