Shri Shamu @ Shamo Vithu Kharwat. v. Shri Rajesh Rohidas Naik And 2 ORS.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 434 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 115 OF 2012 SHRI SHAMU @ SHAMO VITHU KHARWAT.

... Applicant

Versus

SHRI RAJESH ROHIDAS NAIK AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Prashil Arolkar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Emerico Estevam Afonso, Advocate for the respondent no.3. Coram:- NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

Date:- 6th May, 2016 P.C.

i have considered the grounds set out in the application. It appears that the applicants were prevented on genuine grounds and circumstances beyond their control from pursuing the remedy of appeal and that of bringing the legal representatives on record. In view thereof, the delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.1 on record and setting aside the abatement is allowed.

The application stands disposed off.

NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

mukund